<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><channel><title>Yucca Elementary - EdTribune AZ - Arizona Education Data</title><description>Education data coverage for Yucca Elementary. Data-driven education journalism for Arizona. Every number verified against state DOE data.</description><link>https://az.edtribune.com/</link><language>en-us</language><copyright>EdTribune 2026</copyright><item><title>38 Arizona Districts Hit Four-Year Chronic Absence Highs in 2024-25</title><link>https://az.edtribune.com/az/2026-07-09-az-at-all-time-high/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://az.edtribune.com/az/2026-07-09-az-at-all-time-high/</guid><description>The U.S. Department of Education defines chronic absenteeism as missing one-tenth or more of school.</description><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2026 12:00:00 GMT</pubDate><content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;The U.S. Department of Education defines chronic absenteeism as missing &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.ed.gov/teaching-and-administration/supporting-students/chronic-absenteeism&quot;&gt;one-tenth or more of school&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In Arizona, the statewide chronic absenteeism rate ticked down from 24.4% to 23.8% in 2024-25. But behind that average, 38 of 417 comparable districts - 9.1% - recorded their highest chronic absenteeism rate in the 2022-2025 district data available from azschooldata.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;These are not statewide trend lines. They are districts where the package data shows 2024-25 was worse than 2021-22, 2022-23 and 2023-24.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;https://edtribune.com/az/img/2026-07-09-az-at-all-time-high-districts.png&quot; alt=&quot;Districts at four-year high chronic rates in 2024-25&quot; /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2&gt;Where The Highs Are&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;By rate, the five highest districts in the four-year-high group were &lt;a href=&quot;https://edtribune.com/az/districts/vernon-elementary&quot; class=&quot;district-link&quot;&gt;Vernon Elementary&lt;sup&gt;↗&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/a&gt; at 52.5%, &lt;a href=&quot;https://edtribune.com/az/districts/synergy-inc&quot; class=&quot;district-link&quot;&gt;Synergy Public School&lt;sup&gt;↗&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/a&gt; at 51.8%, &lt;a href=&quot;https://edtribune.com/az/districts/mcneal-elementary&quot; class=&quot;district-link&quot;&gt;McNeal Elementary&lt;sup&gt;↗&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/a&gt; at 51.5%, &lt;a href=&quot;https://edtribune.com/az/districts/eagle-south-mountain-charter-inc&quot; class=&quot;district-link&quot;&gt;EAGLE South Mountain Charter&lt;sup&gt;↗&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/a&gt; at 48.2% and &lt;a href=&quot;https://edtribune.com/az/districts/triumphant-learning-center&quot; class=&quot;district-link&quot;&gt;Triumphant Learning Center&lt;sup&gt;↗&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/a&gt; at 43.0%.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The next tier includes &lt;a href=&quot;https://edtribune.com/az/districts/yucca-elementary&quot; class=&quot;district-link&quot;&gt;Yucca Elementary&lt;sup&gt;↗&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/a&gt; at 42.9%, &lt;a href=&quot;https://edtribune.com/az/districts/south-valley-academy-inc&quot; class=&quot;district-link&quot;&gt;South Valley Academy&lt;sup&gt;↗&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/a&gt; at 39.0%, &lt;a href=&quot;https://edtribune.com/az/districts/flagstaff-arts-and-leadership-academy&quot; class=&quot;district-link&quot;&gt;Flagstaff Arts and Leadership Academy&lt;sup&gt;↗&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/a&gt; at 38.3%, &lt;a href=&quot;https://edtribune.com/az/districts/sentinel-elementary&quot; class=&quot;district-link&quot;&gt;Sentinel Elementary&lt;sup&gt;↗&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/a&gt; at 37.5% and &lt;a href=&quot;https://edtribune.com/az/districts/pensar-academy&quot; class=&quot;district-link&quot;&gt;Pensar Academy&lt;sup&gt;↗&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/a&gt; at 36.4%.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The district names show a mixed group of small elementary districts, public-school operators and academy networks. That sector mix is unresourced context: the absence file does not include a structural charter flag, so this article does not make a charter-sector count. The direct evidence is each district&apos;s four-year rate trend.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2&gt;The Split&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The 38 districts sit on the wrong side of Arizona&apos;s attendance recovery. In the same four-year comparable universe, 106 districts lowered their chronic absenteeism rate every year from 2022 through 2025. A broader 329 of 417 districts - 78.9% - had a lower rate in 2025 than in 2022.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;That is the split the statewide average hides. Most comparable districts are below their 2022 rate. A smaller group ended the four-year window at its highest point.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2&gt;Worse Than The Peak Year&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The district window starts in 2022, the year Arizona&apos;s statewide chronic absenteeism rate reached 32.0% - the highest state-level rate in the package&apos;s 2018-2025 series. Every district in the 38-district group had a 2025 rate above its own 2022 rate.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The mechanism is unresourced here. The data can show that these districts moved in the wrong direction while the state average improved slightly; it does not show whether transportation, staffing, health, housing, program model or local policy explains any individual district&apos;s rate.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Detailed code that reproduces the analysis and figures in this article is available exclusively to EdTribune subscribers.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</content:encoded></item></channel></rss>